Harold and Erica Van Pelt: Courtesy
of Kalil Elawar
Natural Brazilian alexandrite crystal.. |
Before the eighteenth century, diamonds came mainly from India,
and were extremely rare, especially in Europe. The Indian sources,
chiefly the Golconda mines in the Indian province of Hyderabad,
were essentially already mined out when diamonds were discovered
in Brazil in 1725. Diamond
exports from Brazil from 1730 to 1787 increased total world diamond
supplies as much as twenty-fold. Due to this abundance, between
1730 and 1735 the diamond market went into freefall and rough diamond
prices dropped seventy-five percent.
With the discovery in the late nineteenth century of vast diamond
reserves in southern Africa, huge supplies of diamonds began to
enter the market. Newer discoveries in Russia, Australia, and, most
recently, Canada have kept supply strong. These discoveries, coupled
with improvements in prospecting and recovery methods, have created
a glut of colorless diamonds.
In 1992 it was estimated that if all diamonds produced by Indian
and Brazilian sources from antiquity to that date were totaled,
that number would be equal to just twenty-two percent of the total
world production of the previous five years. |
In fact, the annual production from
Australia’s Argyle Mine in the early 1990s was approximately
equal to the total amount of diamonds produced in India and Brazil
from antiquity to 1869. In
the past two decades, cut diamond production has increased from
fifty million carats (gem quality) to approximately one hundred
twenty million carats annually. It is estimated that perhaps eight
hundred million cut stones, of all sizes, enter the market every
year.
In the case of diamond, an apparent rarity maintaining the price
structure is created by high demand coupled with a carefully controlled
distribution system. The monopolizing organization, variously called
the cartel, the syndicate, or simply DeBeers, took control of the
diamond market in 1889. Diamonds
are not actually rare, but the syndicate (through selective distribution
and a careful hoarding of reserves) insures that supply does not
exceed demand. Thus the price
of diamonds, as with all other gems, is based on beauty —
plus supply and demand. The difference is that demand for diamonds
is mightily stimulated by advertising, and supply is, or at least
has been, ruthlessly controlled by the DeBeers cartel.
As the new century dawns, the iron control formerly exercised by
DeBeers has begun to slip. In fact, the syndicate claims that it
is no longer trying to control the market. New diamond strikes in
Australia and northern Canada (which are outside the syndicate’s
control) have reduced its influence. From a high of eighty-five
percent a decade ago, currently no more than sixty percent of the
world’s diamonds pass through the cartel’s hands.
Thus far, the main effect of this has been a squeezing of wholesale
and retail profit margins. What does it bode for the future? Unless
new marketing strategies can stimulate demand, the effect of the
diamond glut must inevitably lead to lower prices. |